EAL logo Adult Learning Division CRA
Guidelines
Editorial Board
Archives
About the Site
Contact Us


How Adult Literacy Time and Technology Use Should Be Focused:
Views from Learners and Teachers

References

  • Comings, J. P. (2007). Persistence: Helping adult education students reach their goals. In J. Comings; B. Garner, C. Smith (eds) Connecting research policy and practice: Review of adult learning and literacy, volume 7. Mahwah, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum, Associates.
  • Developmental Associates, (1993). National evaluation of adult education programs: Profiles of client characteristics. Arlington, VA, Author.
  • Division of Adult Education and Literacy (2011) A Division of the U.S. Office of Vocational and Adult Education. Retrieved July 7, 2011 from http://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ovae/pi/AdultEd/index.html
  • Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: a research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33, 14-26.
  • King, C. (2002). Barriers affecting GED participation among recent high school dropouts. Adult Basic Education, 12(3), 145-156.
  • Kotrlik, J.W., & Redmann, D.H. (2005). Extent of technology integration in instruction by adult basic education teachers. Adult Education Quarterly, 55(3), 200-219.
  • Kruidenier, J. (2002). Research-based principles for adult basic education reading instruction. Washington, D.C. National Institute for Literacy.
  • LINCS: Literacy Information and Communication System (2011). Retrieved July 7, 2011 from http://lincs.ed.gov/About
  • McCain, M. (2009). The power of technology to transform adult learning. New York: Council for Advancement of Adult Literacy. Retrieved July 15, 2011 from http://nationalcommissionadultliteracy.org/POWER_OF-TECH.pdf
  • National Center for Educational Statistics (1998). Adult education participation decisions and barriers: Review of conceptual frameworks and empirical studies. Retrieved February 12, 2009 from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs98/9810.pdf
  • National Coalition for Literacy (2009). Retrieved November 24, 2009 from http://national-coalition-literacy.org
  • National Reporting System (2011). The National Reporting System for Adult Education (NRS) is administered by the Division of Adult Education and Literacy in the Office of Vocational and Adult Education at the U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved July 7, 2011 from http://www.nrsweb.org/
  • O’Donnell, K. (2006). Adult Education Participation in 2004-05 (NCES 2006-077). U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
  • Pro-Literacy (2009). Silent Crisis: Results for ProLiteracy Member Survey. Syracuse, NY: ProLiteracy. Retrieved Feb. 27, 2009 from http://www.proliteracy.org/NetCommunity/Page.aspx?pid=547&srcid=191
  • Reder, S. & Strawn, C. (2001). Program participation and self-directed learning to improve basic skills. Focus on Basics, 4(d), 14-17.
  • Robinson-Geller, P. (2007) Individualized group instruction: A reality of adult basic education. I In J. Comings; B. Garner, C. Smith (eds) Connecting research policy and practice: Review of adult learning and literacy, volume 7. Mahwah, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum, Associates
  • Silver-Pacuilla (2008). Investigating the language and literacy skills required for independent online learning. Washington, D.C.: National Institute for Literacy.
  • Spellings, M., Justesen, T., & Keenan, C. (2007). Adult education annual report to congress 2004-2005. Washington, D.C.: U. S. Department of Education.
  • Warschauer, M., & Liaw, M.L. (2010). Emerging technology in adult literacy and language education. National Institute for Literacy. Washington, DC. Young, M.B. (and other). (1995). National evaluation of adult education programs. Retrieved February 12, 2009 from http://eric.ed.gov
  • This site produced by OLRC Web Team copyright © 1999
    New Issue Exploring Adult Literacy Archives ALD Newsletter About the Site Contact Us go to the Association of Literacy Educators and Researchers go to Ohio Literacy Resource Center