Andragogy: Alternative Interpretations and Applications
summarized from
Understanding and Facilitating Adult Learning
by Stephen Brookfield (1986)
Facilitating learning is a transactional encounter in which learner desires and educator priorities will inevitable interact and influence each other.
- I. Andragogy
- A. Andragogy is described as:
- 1. a theory of adult learning
- 2. a theory of adult education
- 3. a theory of the technology of adult learning
- 4. a method of adult education
- 5. a technique of adult education
- 6. a set of assumptions
- 7. a set of assumptions concerning adult learning processes from which we can derive a number of injunctions concerning appropriate teaching methods.
- B. Two assumptions (behavioristically inclined, competency-based) which need to scrutinized carefully (Brookfield, 1986):
- 1. that educational programs should be organized around life application sequences
- 2. that learning experiences should be organized around competency development categories
- 3. These assumptions are problematic in that they
- a. ignore the reflective domain of learning that accounts for most significant personal learning
- b. Underestimates learning that takes place just for enjoyment or personal interest
- C. Other assumptions that are in question include
- 1. Self-directedness is an innate characteristic of adulthood
cultural influence
- 2. Adult learning efforts are problem centered and adults seek immediate application of knowledge
- 3. Adults always seek immediate application of learning within competency
- II. Three distinct interpretations of andragogy:
- A. Lindeman refers to the way in which educators might assist adults to confront the anxiety that accompanies the transition to adulthood.
- B. Knowles offers how facilitators might base their practice on some assumptions about adult learning processes.
- 1. Andragogy is an assumption
- 2. Tendency toward self-directedness is not generally transferred to educational settings by adults.
- 3. Task of facilitator is to create educational program and setting in which adult students can develop their latent self-directed learning skills.
- C. Seven components of andragogical practice
- 1. Facilitators must establish a climate of humanness, physically and psychologically conducive to learning:
- a. circular seating arrangements
- b. climate of mutual respect among all participants
- c. emphasizing collaborative modes of learning
- d. establishing atmosphere of mutual trust
- e. offering to be supportive
- f. emphasizing that learning is pleasant.
- 2. Facilitators must involve learners in mutual planning of methods and curricular directions. People will make firm commitments to activities in which they feel they have played a participatory, contributory role.
- 3. Facilitators must involve participants in diagnosing their own learning needs.
- 4. Facilitators must encourage learners to formulate their own learning objectives.
- 5. Facilitators must encourage learners to identify resources and to devise strategies for using such resources to accomplish their objectives.
- 6. Facilitators must help learners to carry out their learning plans.
- 7. Facilitators must involve learners in evaluating their learning. Principally though the use of qualitative evaluative modes.
- D. The Nottingham Andragogy Group sees a process through which adults become critically aware of the assumptions they have uncritically accepted as governing their conduct and through which they attempt to re-create their lives.
- 1. Andragogy regards adults as contextually based, that is, social beings who are products of history and culture.
- 2. Reinterpret andragogy as development of critical awareness
- 3. Andragogical approach to instruction is one in which adults are encouraged to think critically and not accept another’s interpretation or meaning.
- 4. Twelve salient features identified as essential to the andragogic process
- a. nonprescriptive attitude
- b. issue-centered curricula
- c. problem posing
- d. praxis
- e. continuous negotiation
- f. shared responsibility for learning
- g. valuing process
- h. dialogue
- i. equality
- j. openness
- k. mutual respect
- l. integrated thinking and learning
- 5. Evaluation of development of critical awareness should be integrated into andragogical process and involve all participants. It can be documented in four ways:
- a. Document change in style and content of verbal exchange in classroom
- b. Observe sharing of power and responsibilities
- c. Individual reflection
- d. All group members can reflect on changing nature of group progress.
Go Back
Go Forward
Return to Table of Contents
Return to NISAL Homepage