, workplace literacy, tutoring adult readers, family literacy, adult basic education, adult literacyjournal">
EAL logo Adult Learning Division CRA
Relationship Between Interest And Importance Of Text As Rated By College Readers page 7
Editorial Board
About the Site
Contact Us


Brown, A. L., & Smiley, S. S. (1977). Rating the importance of structural units of prose passages: A problem of metacognitive development. Child Development, 48, 1-8.

Brown, A. L., & Smiley, S. S. (1978). The development of strategies for studying texts. Child Development, 49, 1076-1088.

Garner, R., Alexander, P.A., Gillingham, M. G., Kulikowich, J. M., & Brown, R. (1991). Interest and learning from text. American Educational Research Journal, 28, 643-684.

Garner, R., Gillingham, M. C., & White, J. (1989). Effects of "seductive details" on macroprocessing and microprocessing in adults and children. Cognition and Instruction, 6, 41-57.

Graves, M. F., Slater, W. H., Roen, D., Redd-Boyd, T., Duin, A. H., Furniss, S. W., & Hazeline, P. (1988). Some characteristics of memorable expository writing: Effects of revisions by writers from different backgrounds. Research in the Teaching of English, 22, 242-265.

Hidi, S., & Baird, W. (1986). Interestingness--A neglected variable in discourse processing. Cognitive Science, 10, 179-194.

Hidi, S., & Baird, W. (1988). Strategies for increasing text-based interest and students' recall of expository texts. Reading Research Quarterly, 23, 465-483.

Hidi, S., Baird, W., & Hildyard, A. (1982). That's important but is it interesting? Two factors in text processing. In A. Flammer & W. Kintsch (Eds.), Discourse processing (pp. 63-75). New York: North-Holland.

Hurd, D., Silver, M., Bacher, B. A., & McLaughlin, C. W. (1988). Prentice Hall physical science. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Jetton, T. L., & Alexander, P. A. (1997). Instructional importance: What teachers value and what students learn. Reading Research Quarterly, 32(3), 290-308.

Kintsch, W. (1980). Learning from text, levels of comprehension, or: Why anyone would read a story anyway. Poetics, 9, 87-89.

Kintsch, W., & van Dijk, T. A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85, 363-394.

Meyer, B. J. (1979). Organizational patterns in prose and their use in reading. In M. L.

Kamil & A. J. Moe (Eds.), Reading research: Studies and applications. Twenty-eighth Yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 109-117). Rochester, NY: National Reading Conference.

Meyer, B. J., & Rice, G. E. (1984). The structure of text. In P. D. Pearson (Ed.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 319-351). New York: Longman.

Pearson, P. D., Gallagher, M., Goudvis, A., & Johnson, P. (1981, December). What kinds of expository materials occur in elementary school children's textbooks? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Reading Conference, Dallas, TX.

Schank, R. C. (1979). Interestingness: Controlling inferences. Artificial Intelligence, 12, 273-297.

Smiley, S. S., Oakley, D. D., Worthen, D., Campione, J. C., & Brown, A. L. (1977). Recall of thematically relevant material by adolescent good and poor readers as a function of written versus oral presentation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 69, 381-387.

Wade, S. E., & Adams, R. B. (1990). Effects of importance and interest on recall of biographical text. Journal of Reading Behavior, 22, 231-353.

Wade, S. E., Schraw, G., Buxton, W. M., & Hayes, M. T. (1993). Seduction of the strategic reader: Effects of interest on strategies and recall, Reading Research Quarterly, 28, 93-114.

This site produced by OLRC Web Team copyright © 1999
New Issue Exploring Adult Literacy Archives ALD Newsletter About the Site Contact Us go to the Association of Literacy Educators and Researchers go to Ohio Literacy Resource Center